Performance Results


Gaming 150% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 148% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	12.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '22 at 04:25
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$295 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 127 2-Core 253 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 949 87% 729 Pts	64-Core 1,352 84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2484) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	161% Outstanding	Lighting 216 Reflection 202 Parallax 238 176% 218 fps	MRender 259 Gravity 226 Splatting 176 175% 220 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$97 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 325 330 300 258 278 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 2,183 Write 1,359 Mixed 426 SusWrite 341 236% 1,077 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 88.8 4K Mixed 46.8 153% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 588 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 343 273% 390 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 179GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 378 478 481 479 478 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 482 Mixed 405 SusWrite 424 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 92.6 4K Mixed 55.2 182% 63 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 355 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 80GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 349 455 460 458 456 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 464 Mixed 420 SusWrite 399 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 48.6 158% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 292 236% 335 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB 54,117 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 26.4 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 26.8 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 106%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	65x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	64x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	77x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	73x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	68x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	73x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	54x

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $634

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16