User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardPEGATRON IPXSB-H61
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 00:38
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 344
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
PwrHis(1787 2310) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 14
13% 14.7 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 11
Splatting 16.3
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 96
Write 99.5
Mixed 98.8
74% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.31
81% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback