Acer Nitro AN517-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-42  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Ignis_RBH
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 08:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 220
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 820
74% 621 Pts
64-Core 1341
83% 1341 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 159D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.28
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 69.5
35% 62 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 52.7
35% 40.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 1096 1328 1466 1498 1496 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,666
Write 1,558
Mixed 1,432
SusWrite 1,375
339% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 58.5
179% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 610
423% 541 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 230%
Great: 442%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 38.4
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 28.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 114%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN517-42 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro AN517-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback