Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 01:18
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 277
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,096
98% 829 Pts
64-Core 2,108
130% 2,108 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$170
Dell(1028 3301) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 108
Parallax 99.9
80% 102 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 96.2
Splatting 96.6
79% 95.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJP600M512GB 512GB
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0620A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1150 1211 1227 1299 1278 1308 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,542
Write 1,248
Mixed 1,039
SusWrite 1,245
285% 1,269 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 29.8
195% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 355
344% 526 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 221%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 38.3
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 36.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 117%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback