| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110308 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 27 '17 at 15:16 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.1%
Above average
|
52% 78.2 Pts
|
13% 95.7 Pts
|
6% 90.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1615 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
33% 41.4 fps
|
19% 22.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59.6%
Above average
|
58% 256 MB/s
|
102% 40.5 MB/s
|
26% 48.4 MB/s
|
|
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
24% 32.2 MB/s
|
135% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 991805 (996805)000 991805 (996805)000 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
32.1%
Below average
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
22% 7.83 GB/s
|
60% 66.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 36x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 25x |
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 6x |
| HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $241 |