ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130820
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '14 at 16:54
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 77.9 2-Core 193 59% 135 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 375 51% 380 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 50% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 042A) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.200.0.0 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 38.1 27% 34.3 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 34.5 Splatting 41.4 30% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6505 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1139 (B1) Unknown 93 93 65 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 98 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1380037847	41.7% Average	Read 389 Write 76.9 Mixed 99.9 40% 189 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 9.1 69% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.4 DQ Write 51.6 DQ Mixed 8.36 15% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 73%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 261GB free Firmware: CP100-11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5632 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11780 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 26587 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5422 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 844350 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 39 (BE) vendor-specific 73 50 27 (C2) HDA temperature 157 88 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 844350 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	41% Average	Read 67.9 Write 74.9 Mixed 68.6 53% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.31 82% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 43%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 149GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5220 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11244 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 16717 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 3 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4889 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 55 454098970 (C2) HDA temperature 73 52 454098971 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 5625476 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	44.7% Average	Read 78.8 Write 76.7 Mixed 77.3 58% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.31 80% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 64GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 56GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 125 Write 18.8 Mixed 30.5 54% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.48 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.85 99% 2.89 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 26%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$36 590 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 29GB free, PID 1697 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 186 Write 25.7 Mixed 44.8 79% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.87 4K Write 0.47 4K Mixed 0.58 58% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	187x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	20x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback