Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510QA
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 23:25
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 35.6
1-Core 50
2-Core 94.9
34% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 140
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 1931) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 10.2
6% 8.63 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 7.5
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fikwot FN203 1TB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14546
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 241 317 296 352 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 291
Write 319
Mixed 269
SusWrite 300
67% 295 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 17.1
61% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 169
127% 170 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-S16G-2133 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.9
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 0 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback