Today's hottest deals

Advan 1701

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAdvan 1701  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '23 at 13:13
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 251
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 794
73% 611 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1E50 8018) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 35.4
15% 26.9 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 27.6
18% 20.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SCY SMM5T1G51200D 512GB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H221101a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2084 2003 1747 602 662 656 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2135
Write 2,306
Mixed 1818
SusWrite 1,292
425% 1,888 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64
232% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 670
494% 639 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 263%
Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 32.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 26.4
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 51 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0A6A
Typical 1701 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Advan 1701

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback