Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateSep 17 '23 at 16:00
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 492
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.8
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDAS256 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0805A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 195 52 33 53 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 465
Write 402
Mixed 377
SusWrite 97.3
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 17.1
90% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 26.5
77% 159 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
464GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 121
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 40 30 60 24" 1920 1017 AUS24CB ASUS VP248
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback