Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 297%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO690
Memory38.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230127
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 19:36
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 209
2-Core 424
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,464
138% 1,143 Pts
64-Core 3,509
217% 3,509 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 117%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 3006) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
208% Outstanding
Lighting 285
Reflection 327
Parallax 322
232% 311 fps
MRender 430
Gravity 280
Splatting 206
238% 305 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 208%
Great: 243%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 441 420 425 614 553 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,184
Write 196
Mixed 817
SusWrite 481
200% 919 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 75.4
264% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,838
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 770
636% 960 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 245%
Great: 427%
SHPP41-2000GM 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51060A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2844 3427 3425 3407 3404 3430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
542% Outstanding
Read 4,098
Write 3,314
Mixed 2,791
SusWrite 3,323
759% 3,381 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 98.6
330% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 2,030
DQ Write 1,269
DQ Mixed 633
745% 1,311 MB/s
Poor: 301%
This bench: 542%
Great: 641%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556S40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 75.5
MC Write 70.6
MC Mixed 70.7
206% 72.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 31.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 182%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 100 34" 1280 720 SAM0E25 C34H89x
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback