Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 16:34
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 613
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 116
Parallax 123
107% 124 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 101
Splatting 86.3
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung CM871 M.2 2280 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT21D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 21 15 17 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 57%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 993GB
750GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 128 109 200 185 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 420
Write 360
Mixed 290
SusWrite 167
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 14.1
64% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 24.6
39% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOY ND4U0836163BCWDX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 27.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 24.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 22" 1280 720 HIT7D0D U220W DVI
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback