Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GS75 Stealth 9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-17G1  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 11:31
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 135
62% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 358
34% 282 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1277) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 80.8
Parallax 39.6
43% 57.6 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 0
Splatting 0
0% 0 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,232
Write 1,706
Mixed 1,076
300% 1,338 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 54.4
180% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 570
420% 555 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Samsung PSSD T7 Shield 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 319 306 297 341 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 269
Write 313
Mixed 290
SusWrite 309
67% 295 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 26.4
73% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 36
DQ Mixed 34.6
24% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 16.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 50 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25A8 VG259QM
Typical MS-17G1 Builds (Compare 997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback