Today's hottest deals

Micro Venus Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive534% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro Venus Series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSD
Memory24.2 GB free of 48 GB
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateMar 14 '24 at 11:54
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 70.2
1-Core 194
2-Core 383
111% 216 Pts
4-Core 764
8-Core 1,488
133% 1,126 Pts
64-Core 1,764
109% 1,764 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Device(1F4C B016) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.7% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 62.2
47% 43.7 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 99.2
55% 61.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$135
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3737 3986 3927 3837 3812 3683 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
534% Outstanding
Read 3,852
Write 4,112
Mixed 2,881
SusWrite 3,830
827% 3,669 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 68.3
228% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,922
DQ Write 1,503
DQ Mixed 1,743
1,296% 1,722 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 534%
Great: 666%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT48G56C46S5.M16B1 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.2% Very good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 30.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 11 120 48.8" 5120 1369 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical Venus Series Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Micro Venus Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback