Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-72

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-72  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL EQE_RTX
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 18:13
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 212
2-Core 430
123% 240 Pts
4-Core 828
8-Core 1,365
134% 1,096 Pts
64-Core 2,775
172% 2,775 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1731) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 160
Parallax 145
140% 159 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 122
Splatting 99.3
116% 148 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1437 1531 1563 1578 1583 1569 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 3,531
Write 1,388
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 1,544
412% 1,872 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 18.7
187% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,208
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 981
689% 889 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 325%
Great: 581%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 69.4
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 55.5
165% 57.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 28.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 149%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 165 16" 1536 889 CMN1616
Typical Predator PHN16-72 Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PHN16-72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback