Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507NV
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 22:01
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 125
50% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 500
43% 367 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 19DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.50
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.1% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 49.9
Parallax 77.4
34% 56.4 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 25.7
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,758
Write 1,236
Mixed 1,424
327% 1,473 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 41.5
145% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 391
268% 341 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 465%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 39
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 23.7
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 104%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 20% 5 213 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507NV_FA507NV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback