Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Lite AL15-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire Lite AL15-52  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Lite AL15-52
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '24 at 18:14
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 53.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 278
83% 160 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 517
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 4150) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 10.3
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 11.3
11% 14.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ap512gpd4480-0g PD4480 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APC00PN0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1212 1349 499 1150 633 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,123
Write 1,822
Mixed 1,299
SusWrite 869
290% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 63.9
208% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 634
480% 638 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 191%
Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ZM4G7S8DXN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 784 CMN15F5
Typical Aspire Lite AL15-52 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Lite AL15-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback