Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83EM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 20:17
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 47.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 191
64% 118 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 317
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.55% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 10.6
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 9.8
9% 11 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 7.55%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD1T0QFM-1BD1AABLA 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 743 1045 968 1286 1637 1383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 849
Write 1,029
Mixed 704
SusWrite 1,177
213% 940 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 23.4
108% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 231
166% 220 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 148%
Great: 388%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 37.9
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 14% 21 119 56 60 15.5" 1536 793 LEN9052
Typical 83EM Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback