Today's hottest deals

Samsung 750XFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 750XFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750XFG-KB5SE
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 15 '24 at 15:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 55.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 341
97% 190 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 902
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1D3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 21.5
15% 20.7 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 15.5
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00B 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 930 1108 973 913 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,360
Write 1,187
Mixed 1,104
SusWrite 822
251% 1,118 MB/s
4K Read 74.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 90.9
321% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 818
658% 926 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 247%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AB-MGCL 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 56.4
MC Mixed 48.3
143% 50 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 23
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0AD9
Typical 750XFG Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750XFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback