Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook Power 16 inch G11 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Power 16 inch G11 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8CA0
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240513
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateAug 19 '24 at 13:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 58.4
1-Core 180
2-Core 354
100% 197 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 762
81% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,626
101% 1,626 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics X8 (H-iGPU)
HP(103C 8CA0) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 77.1
33% 47.8 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 64.4
42% 48.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TB
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NGXH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,180
Write 1,689
Mixed 1,918
429% 1,929 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 68.7
224% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 742
509% 643 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC56BD1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
158% Outstanding
MC Read 67.4
MC Write 62.3
MC Mixed 59.9
181% 63.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 27.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 158%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 16" 1280 720 AUO10AB
Typical ZBook Power 16 inch G11 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP ZBook Power 16 inch G11 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback