Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 372%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive526% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi Carrara  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Memory55 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '24 at 19:52
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X-$623
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 243
2-Core 476
135% 266 Pts
4-Core 947
8-Core 1,843
165% 1,395 Pts
64-Core 4,530
280% 4,530 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 128%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,380
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
219% Outstanding
Lighting 326
Reflection 304
Parallax 344
265% 324 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 263
Splatting 193
215% 274 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 219%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T705 M.2 4TB-$520
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2679 3685 3920 3390 3345 3628 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
526% Outstanding
Read 5,335
Write 4,087
Mixed 3,230
SusWrite 3,441
900% 4,023 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 55.5
187% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,811
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 410
451% 809 MB/s
Poor: 492%
This bench: 526%
Great: 994%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$290
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,450
Write 2,348
Mixed 2401
536% 2,400 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 41.7
146% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,759
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 383
431% 780 MB/s
Poor: 306% Great: 619%
WDC WD181KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB
17TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 256
Write 257
Mixed 136
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 0.9
15% 6 MB/s
DQ Read 3.8
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 2.6
3% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 39%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
27GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.2
Write 34.6
Mixed 12
34% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
24% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
176% Outstanding
MC Read 71
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 66.7
184% 64.2 GB/s
SC Read 48.8
SC Write 69
SC Mixed 54.9
164% 57.6 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 176%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 100 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0FA Dell AW3418DW
Typical X670E Taichi Carrara Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 423%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 534%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback