Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Zenbook 14 UX3405MA_Q415MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS Zenbook 14 UX3405MA_Q415MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX3405MA
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime6 Days
Run DateSep 18 '24 at 03:09
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 18 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 39.3
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 235
62% 125 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 783
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics
Asus(1043 1A63) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5522
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 57.5
14% 32.5 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 50
Splatting 0.1
13% 17.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme MTFDKBA512QFM-1BD1AABGB 512GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 297 26 41 84 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 814
Write 668
Mixed 753
SusWrite 146
133% 595 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 20.1
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 328
239% 319 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 256%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL6L60GM-MGCT 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 58.5
144% 50.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 25.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 127%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 60 14" 1280 767 SDC41A0
Typical ASUS Zenbook 14 UX3405MA_Q415MA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Asus ASUS Zenbook 14 UX3405MA_Q415MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback