Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA401WV
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240905
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '24 at 08:34
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 HX 370
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 55.1
1-Core 188
2-Core 361
102% 201 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,058
109% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,964
122% 1,964 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 3798) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.3% Above average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 107
49% 67 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 79.6
Splatting 77
77% 97.7 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00-1002 1TB
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 34230100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1389 1463 1412 1328 1236 995 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,609
Write 1,031
Mixed 1,268
SusWrite 1,304
292% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 57.2
185% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 478
318% 385 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 217%
Great: 514%
Samsung PSSD T7 Shield 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 0 85 150 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 369
Write 604
Mixed 396
SusWrite 107
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 26.1
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 143
99% 125 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 77.6
MC Write 70
MC Mixed 64.8
202% 70.8 GB/s
SC Read 38.8
SC Write 84.8
SC Mixed 62.6
177% 62.1 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 192%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 4 50 34" 3440 1440 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback