Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision T1600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1600 (all builds)
Memory	18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111017
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '18 at 01:41
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 157 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 288 39% 291 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.2% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 3.53 3% 4 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon LMH-512V2M-11 MM 512GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: FM91 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 3 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 127 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4393 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2738	97.3% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 426 Mixed 466 104% 468 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 34.4 126% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 70.1 107% 202 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 86GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 142541696 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7726 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 17186848622 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 37541 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 452 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 71 50 460133761053 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 198 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 38957 (C2) HDA temperature 29 50 -140737488355299 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 108593953116492 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7176845899 (F2) Unknown 100 253 9711933196	69.6% Good	Read 142 Write 101 Mixed 94.7 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.19 61% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 31GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 80 28 (02) Throughput performance 134 100 100 (03) Spinup time 128 100 25788809519 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5327 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1310742 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 35658 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 445 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 92 92 589823 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 100 83 8619164133 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 472186911 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5601 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5601 (C2) HDA temperature 193 117 223339741215 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 22 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	45.5% Average	Read 39.7 Write 119 Mixed 114 69% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.3 83% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 3x8GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

CPU
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples	199x
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples	164x
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples	98x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	52x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	47x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350