Zotac ZBOX-OI520

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Zotac ZBOX-OI520 (all builds)
Motherboard	ZOTAC ZBOX-OI520
Memory	2.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140107
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '18 at 04:47
Run Duration	490 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	96%
CPU Throttled	69%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281 64,450 User benchmarks, average bench 43% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Memory 4.26 1-Core 20.3 2-Core 47.6 11% 24.1 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 153 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA B229) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.41% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 4.09 2% 3.57 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 5.13 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.41% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Goldenfir T650-120G 127GB 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0527A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1015 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 721 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 158 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 38 (A4) Unknown 100 100 2818274 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1396 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1343 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1372 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 36 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1475 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 663903 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1217042 (F5) Unknown 100 100 4052090	38.8% Below average	Read 467 Write 136 Mixed 208 59% 270 MB/s	4K Read 7.69 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 2.79 31% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 72.8 DQ Write 68.8 DQ Mixed 10.3 24% 50.6 MB/s

WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 98.3 Write 90.6 Mixed 28.2 85% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.05 37% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 59%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 715GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Read 8.33 Write 2.93 Mixed 3.35 5% 4.87 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.24 4K Mixed 0.15 15% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-123.A00LF 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 12GB 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.2% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 461 9% 461 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16