Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory	53.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151104
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '16 at 17:31
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 60 1-Core 59.1 2-Core 118 47% 79.1 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 473 42% 354 Pts	64-Core 1,651 102% 1,651 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2951) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Lighting 38.8 Reflection 35.5 Parallax 31.8 32% 35.4 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 34 Splatting 33.9 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 155GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 522 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 159 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 64 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 88 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3521917798	66.7% Good	Read 345 Write 292 Mixed 296 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 24 97% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 81.9 DQ Mixed 71.4 67% 107 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 141GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1033 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 307 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7914832294	102% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 406 Mixed 191 81% 369 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 44.2 158% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 101 99% 159 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,632 Write 817 Mixed 1,101 261% 1,183 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 51.8 240% 95 MB/s	DQ Read 488 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 182 191% 320 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 53GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 352 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 119 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 63 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 65 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1740823286	70.2% Very good	Read 371 Write 290 Mixed 194 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 26.4 106% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 79.4 DQ Mixed 68.9 66% 106 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 862GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2275 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4291 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4932 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 339 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 34 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4256 (C2) HDA temperature 116 102 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	101% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 175 Mixed 148 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 2.89 4K Mixed 0.32 134% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.7% Above average	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 20.6 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 8 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	11x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	21x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	12x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $643

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16