Lenovo 10AAS0J717

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 10AAS0J717  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '18 at 09:10
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4570T-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 177
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 257
35% 257 Pts
64-Core 258
17% 258 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 30A3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 1.16
1% 1.09 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 3.65
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
ESA3SME2STSBT240GB 240GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 496
Write 459
Mixed 468
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 23
97% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 21.8
23% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback