HP 810-303no

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP 810-303no (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '18 at 09:36
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 144 54% 93.4 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 366 39% 311 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.7% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 39.6 Parallax 40 35% 40.8 fps	MRender 34.6 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 33 29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SDSA6DM-016G-1006 16GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 13GB free Firmware: U221006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1956 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1678 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1474641 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 740 (AE) Unknown 100 100 172 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 32 197568888864 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2466 (EA) Unknown 100 100 875 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9991388591 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4311667137	25.5% Poor	Read 241 Write 50.1 Mixed 81.1 27% 124 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 6.26 41% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 35.4 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 6.54 9% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 28%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5570 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1501 (B1) Unknown 94 94 111 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 49 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 119 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22016599394	98.3% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 395 Mixed 406 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 36.3 138% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 103 124% 218 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000DM003-1CH162 2TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 188489984 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2243 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 21343685 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2887 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1452 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 73 47 454033435 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 301 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 25788 (C2) HDA temperature 27 53 55834574875 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -135261405051520 (F1) Unknown 100 253 19350536869 (F2) Unknown 100 253 21629340425	106% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 180 Mixed 171 135% 180 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.28 86% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30 4,341 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 154GB free Firmware: FBEOC40C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 17179869184 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4555 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 5584 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3341 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 218 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 68943 (C2) HDA temperature 239 239 249108693015 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 17 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 91 91 4081 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9212874625 (F2) Unknown 100 100 10024533533	24.7% Poor	Read 37.4 Write 48.5 Mixed 40.9 32% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.88 4K Mixed 0.28 63% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 85GB free Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 121005576 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1830 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 227134200 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6160 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1682 (B4) Unknown 100 100 380535028 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 53 470810652 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 136 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 38484 (C2) HDA temperature 28 47 34359738396 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 109 Write 91.6 Mixed 93.1 74% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.04 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.07 16% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-303no Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: HP 810-303no

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GBUnknownBench 60%, 29 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $235

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16