Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	74.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock B85M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140703
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '18 at 13:51
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 88.7 1-Core 98 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 183 21% 163 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.4% Very good	Lighting 91.2 Reflection 92.7 Parallax 78.7 74% 87.5 fps	MRender 83.3 Gravity 100 Splatting 88.9 74% 90.9 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1510 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 417 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 26 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 46 231929348133 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 6791364695 (F7) Unknown 100 100 212988830 (F8) Unknown 100 100 133417031 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1254 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	67.7% Good	Read 476 Write 330 Mixed 337 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 13.5 88% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 40.5 39% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 73 (03) Spinup time 132 132 34388050354 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3325 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3948 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1547 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3515 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3515 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 210454511650 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	97.4% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 172 Mixed 159 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.22 88% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.3 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	189x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	139x
Core i5-4690Intel $52Bench 67%, 73,695 samples	133x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	114x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	86x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	83x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	35x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	37x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	36x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $387

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16