Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F5
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151214
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '18 at 15:59
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 49.9 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 43.9 27% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 60.8 8-Core 93.1 10% 76.9 Pts	64-Core 92 6% 92 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 2.56 1% 2.02 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.24 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GB 476 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2455 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3798 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 55 (AE) Unknown 99 99 45 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 361 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 49 43 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 16315841 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4603 (F2) Unknown 99 99 4992 (F9) Unknown 99 99 7040	45.5% Average	Read 481 Write 92.5 Mixed 130 50% 235 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 10.6 66% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 38 DQ Mixed 15.9 16% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 89%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 891GB free Firmware: AX1P4M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1725 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 12382 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 2096 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3765 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 7 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 23 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 21456 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159020065 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 462 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 261 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	59.6% Above average	Read 110 Write 98.1 Mixed 94.9 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.19 66% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GB 714 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 6 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	186x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	82x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	48x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	262x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	84x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	39x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	14x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 714 samples	72x
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 976 samples	46x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16