Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 51 1-Core 14.8 2-Core 34.7 24% 33.5 Pts	4-Core 33.2 8-Core 34 4% 33.6 Pts	64-Core 35.1 2% 35.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9082) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.89% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.89% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galax TA 1D0240A 240GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 84 84 98 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65539 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 307	48.1% Average	Read 338 Write 353 Mixed 397 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 8.88 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 6.5 35% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 75 DQ Write 51.6 DQ Mixed 13.9 24% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GB 8,698 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.28% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.28% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16