bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System
Motherboard	Intel DZ77RE-75K
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120426
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '18 at 16:56
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 167 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 429 43% 350 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.6% Poor	Lighting 30.6 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 40.4 25% 32.9 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 29.7 Splatting 31.3 27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 600GB-$466 694 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8974 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1236 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 112 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 673195 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 21779 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 2684958535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 673195 (F2) Unknown 100 100 652362	35.7% Below average	Read 250 Write 187 Mixed 120 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 8.97 46% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 6.8 DQ Write 22.7 DQ Mixed 1.98 5% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 55%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 178 5825 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3762 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6580 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 795 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 31 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 175 175 76657 (C2) HDA temperature 127 103 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.4% Average	Read 95.5 Write 73 Mixed 102 68% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.17 74% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 83%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB 6,787 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 865GB free Firmware: SN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 63 190093586 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5878 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 48 48 365078265153 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8439 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1182 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 53 387186711 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 77 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6457 (C2) HDA temperature 23 47 34359738391 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 118 99 190093586 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	71% Very good	Read 132 Write 116 Mixed 118 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.42 101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500514NS 500GB-$19 1,968 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 466GB free Firmware: SN11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 80 63 109194684 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6716 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3556892 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4068 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2183 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065667 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 51 387186711 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 325 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 8541 (C2) HDA temperature 23 49 47244640279 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 18 109194684 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	74.7% Very good	Read 132 Write 128 Mixed 101 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.51 132% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 947 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 309GB free, PID a003 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.25% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 20.1 Mixed 20.1 26% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.31 32% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.25% Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 152GB free, PID 70f1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 26.1 Mixed 26.8 35% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.07 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.05 12% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-001.A01LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 99P5471-001.A01LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.2% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.8 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,019x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,563x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	930x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,037x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16