MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180128
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '18 at 21:26
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 206 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 640 63% 513 Pts	64-Core 828 51% 828 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1339 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.8% Above average	Lighting 62.6 Reflection 68.4 Parallax 92.1 51% 74.4 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 62.4 Splatting 55.7 50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4663 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1898 (B1) Unknown 97 97 55 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 55 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 87 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14738049003	97.5% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 410 Mixed 417 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 38.3 142% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 77.3 88% 153 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 115%
Mushkin Chronos 60GB-$65 105 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 12GB free Firmware: 609ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 10759082 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14705968024477 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1089 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 124 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 35 47 68722556963 (C2) HDA temperature 35 47 68722556963 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 10759082 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 10759082 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 10759082 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1963 (EA) Unknown 0 0 359 (F1) Unknown 0 0 359 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2513	39.5% Below average	Read 293 Write 53.3 Mixed 82 31% 143 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 8.98 78% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 43.1 DQ Write 57.7 DQ Mixed 15.3 21% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 77%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 881GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 170 4333 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 457 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1257 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 363 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 52 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14597 (C2) HDA temperature 113 105 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.9% Good	Read 104 Write 112 Mixed 112 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.21 102% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 84%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB 5,813 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 878GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 75 74 7734 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4822 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7926 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3130 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 58 180389347359 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 9 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 4913	64.3% Good	Read 111 Write 113 Mixed 98.2 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.54 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$130 1,513 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 28.3 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 25.8 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	31x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $684

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)