| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte H110M-DS2 |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20171107 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 18 '18 at 13:25 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | VNM-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.4%
Average
|
61% 103 Pts
|
15% 119 Pts
|
11% 179 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
19% 20.6 fps
|
18% 22.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD05PURX-64E5EY0 500GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 78.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
42.5%
Average
|
56% 73.9 MB/s
|
50% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown GLLF62F-C6---------- 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.6%
Below average
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
20% 7.2 GB/s
|
43% 93.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,332 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 359x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 289x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 213x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 300x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 167x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 145x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |