Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735F 6,544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 15.8 2-Core 30.3 28% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 52.8 8-Core 53.1 7% 52.9 Pts	64-Core 55.6 3% 55.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1027 2014) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.7% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.78 1% 0.8 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.7% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung BGND3R 31GB 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.7% Poor	Read 162 Write 124 Mixed 144 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 5.29 48% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19.1 DQ Write 33 DQ Mixed 5.65 10% 19.3 MB/s

Generic SD Card 4GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free Firmware: 0.0 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	5.95% Terrible	Read 10.6 Write 8.29 Mixed 9.26 7% 9.39 MB/s	4K Read 5.51 4K Write 0.15 4K Mixed 0.15 249% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.95% Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 37 Write 8.89 Mixed 14 20% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.16 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 1.37 103% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 0.6 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16