Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Chipset) (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170307
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	May 30 '18 at 00:51
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 114 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 108 52% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 345 34% 277 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 1167) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.82 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 5 Parallax 3.47 4% 4.25 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.53 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20618 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 652 (B1) Unknown 89 89 217 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 49 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 496 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 135061030679	105% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 403 Mixed 399 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 43.1 154% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 105 124% 218 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 7.83 Mixed 10.1 13% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.96 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 16% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 4,751 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 0.8 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	4x
RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
730 Series 480GBIntel $230Bench 96%, 5,159 samples	1x

RAM
9905403-199.A 9905403-199.A Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5 99U5471-020.A 16GBKingstonBench 85%, 3 samples	3x
36KSZF1G72PZ- 2x8GBMicronBench 46%, 5 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 2x8GBCorsairBench 44%, 2,237 samples	1x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $369

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16