PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar H61MH (all builds) |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120511 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 06 '18 at 14:59 |
Run Duration | 209 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Biostar(1565 110D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.07%
Terrible
|
|||
AMD RX 480-$75
MSI(1462 809E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
70.2%
Very good
|
|||
62%
Good
|
||||
55.1%
Above average
|
||||
42.4%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
33.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 19x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 14x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 31x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $87 |