Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170809
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 25 '18 at 08:01
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 863
83% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 37.3
38% 38.1 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 35.7
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,758
Write 1,246
Mixed 1,210
311% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 24.1
92% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 14.9
19% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 176%
Great: 236%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 116
Write 133
Mixed 128
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.32
101% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 123%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 7.13
Mixed 7.57
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.23
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
16% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 14.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 9.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback