Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0 3,589 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 127 58% 93.6 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 291 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 0428) 3GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	9.42% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 49.5 0% 26.1 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 35.4 28% 33.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 44 48 33 54 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 340 Write 94 Mixed 116 SusWrite 43.3 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 17.2 54% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 24.2 DQ Mixed 21.3 16% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 55%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 49GB free Firmware: 12.01B03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 47 51 33 55 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 66.2 Write 67.3 Mixed 49.1 SusWrite 45.3 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 204GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 123 122 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 120 Write 114 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 122 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 2x8GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.2% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 6.8 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	236x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	51x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	167x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	142x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16