Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSamsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateApr 02 '16 at 22:47
Run Duration566 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2675QM
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 40.3
15% 30.7 Pts
4-Core 69.9
8-Core 103
11% 86.6 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 2.7
1% 3.77 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.9
1% 3.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB
0GB free
Firmware: SSD 9.14 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 114
Write 25.5
Mixed 29.9
12% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.63
4K Write 3.84
4K Mixed 1.68
14% 4.05 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 15%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 99
Write 95.7
Mixed 89.6
71% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.24
72% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.85% Terrible
Read 46
Write 7.93
Mixed 11.8
21% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.15
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.003
23% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.85%
Great: 23%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB
1GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 5.71
Mixed 6.65
10% 9.74 MB/s
4K Read 2.17
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.16
14% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 9.91
Mixed 10.1
15% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.37
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.009
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback