PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161129 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 15 '18 at 19:44 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
83%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 154 111 89 76 66 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 26 21 24 30 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
799GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 101 96 100 100 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
123GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 41 35 37 38 MB/s
|
65.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
5GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 79 83 83 74 MB/s
|
55.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
123GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 370x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 78x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 100x |
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 46x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 42x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $1,445 |