IBM 00J6520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive410% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardIBM 00J6520  (all builds)
Memory30.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime5 Days
Run DateApr 11 '16 at 22:51
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 103
51% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 350
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 299GB
278GB free
Firmware: 3.45
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 3,748
Write 3,552
Mixed 4,411
874% 3,903 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 40.2
164% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 118
121% 198 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 427%
Great: 247%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 146GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.45
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
410% Outstanding
Read 3,569
Write 3,425
Mixed 4,384
850% 3,793 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 40.2
160% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 121
118% 186 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 32GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 31.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback