HP 870-255ng

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 870-255ng (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 830C
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '18 at 11:10
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 62.6 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 93.9 43% 69.1 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 725 58% 513 Pts	64-Core 729 45% 729 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.4% Good	Lighting 63.9 Reflection 94.2 Parallax 100 52% 86.1 fps	MRender 92.9 Gravity 91.1 Splatting 95.6 76% 93.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 376 268 245 236 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 355 Write 357 Mixed 303 SusWrite 283 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 15.3 56% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 260 190% 248 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 1TB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 129GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 322 317 302 306 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 302 Write 296 Mixed 282 SusWrite 308 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 15.8 47% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 88.7 DQ Write 87.1 DQ Mixed 91.4 68% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 208 207 207 209 211 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 164 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 208 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 147 153 152 146 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 67.5 Write 131 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 146 73% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 175% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.5% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 22.9 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-255ng Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

System: HP 870-255ng

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	1x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 86%, 13,446 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16