Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 86.4 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 162 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 328 44% 326 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 39 52 47 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 75.8 Write 62.3 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 44.2 42% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 69% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 70%
Leef Bridge 3.0 16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.5 9.1 9.1 9 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	9.33% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 8 Mixed 16 SusWrite 9.8 18% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.33% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 5GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	46.1% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 13.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	447x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	394x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	79x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16