Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD3  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20091109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '16 at 09:28
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 95.4
48% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 159
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 41.7
36% 42.7 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 34.4
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 450 128GB-$80
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 372
Write 183
Mixed 243
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 11.8
70% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 12.9
39% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
687GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 86.5
Mixed 61.5
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.18
85% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
374GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 118
Write 97.7
Mixed 99.9
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.16
72% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
80GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 65.5
Write 76.2
Mixed 28.6
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.52
114% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 61%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
36GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 107
Write 115
Mixed 33.3
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.16
71% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
4GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 62.2
Write 79.4
Mixed 54.8
49% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.15
58% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
2GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49% Average
Read 91.8
Write 79.1
Mixed 79.6
63% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.28
67% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD3 Builds (Compare 516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback