Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Killer (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160613
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '16 at 10:54
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GUM-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2686 v3 32 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 129 58% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 576 51% 434 Pts	64-Core 1,578 98% 1,578 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 109 Parallax 112 92% 111 fps	MRender 86.1 Gravity 89.9 Splatting 84.7 71% 86.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190 3,375 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1890 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 303 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 24 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 83 (C2) HDA temperature 65 59 176094838819 (F1) Unknown 100 100 82042	59.4% Above average	Read 494 Write 327 Mixed 350 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 7.7 51% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 6.76 36% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 103%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 8760 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1017 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 3678 (0A) Spinup retry count 120 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 274 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 26 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 49 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1290 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 193274642460 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 781 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 208 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	93.1% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 161 Mixed 153 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 2.57 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.24 170% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 110%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 8626 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 735 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 2529 (0A) Spinup retry count 114 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 339 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2120 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 57 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 911 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 180389806108 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 547 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 215 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	95.4% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 167 Mixed 150 121% 161 MB/s	4K Read 4.53 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.32 266% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB 463 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2218 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	MC Read 57.9 MC Write 44.9 MC Mixed 45.6 141% 49.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 16.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $242

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	51x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	10x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $73Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 76%, 29,684 samples	5x
HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 2,054 samples	4x
GR2133D464L15/8G 2x8GBGoodramBench 73%, 520 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16