Asus X450CP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus X450CP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450CP
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '17 at 09:02
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 96
49% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 126
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAF10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 76.9
Write 77.6
Mixed 13
40% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.18
65% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 58%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
678GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 29.6
Write 25.6
Mixed 22.2
32% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 3.58
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X450CP Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X450CP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback