Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120327
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '17 at 07:43
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 101 49% 77.9 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 143 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770 16,639 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gigabyte(1458 220C) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 14.7 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 12.6 12% 12.7 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 12.6 10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1111 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 70 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C2) HDA temperature 70 65 150325297182 (F1) Unknown 100 100 21205	56% Above average	Read 484 Write 313 Mixed 334 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 7.65 55% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 63.4 DQ Mixed 7.61 16% 30.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 95%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 5GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 85 85 5347124 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 -89781996332978 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 817 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 42 (B1) Unknown 0 0 11 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5347124 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5347124 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5347124 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13092 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8418 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8418 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9588	47.1% Average	Read 432 Write 71.7 Mixed 113 44% 206 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 11.3 74% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 66.8 DQ Mixed 9.63 28% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 70%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 571GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 103099454 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6337 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 64 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 300242384 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21114 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 9 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3631 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 10 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 561 (BE) vendor-specific 69 54 655949855 (C2) HDA temperature 31 46 68719476767 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 21 103099454 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	37% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 67.3 Mixed 29.7 39% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.34 81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 272GB free Firmware: ML6OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 107 (03) Spinup time 138 138 34385822095 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4086 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 146 146 29 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17760 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 767 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4128 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4128 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 188979937311 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.4% Above average	Read 79.4 Write 117 Mixed 67.2 66% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.31 78% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 166GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 144 137 3783 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6730 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21872 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 792 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 90019 (C2) HDA temperature 115 102 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.4% Good	Read 119 Write 119 Mixed 115 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.52 4K Mixed 0.22 109% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB 2,942 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 13.9 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11.1 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16