ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4223AU4

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4223AU4 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '17 at 22:52
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 55.4 1-Core 85 2-Core 174 57% 105 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 630 58% 484 Pts	64-Core 1,615 100% 1,615 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.1% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 145 Parallax 131 97% 132 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 141 Splatting 112 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225 3,223 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: N103 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 422 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 63 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 49 (C2) HDA temperature 74 63 158914969626 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	52.5% Above average	Read 463 Write 114 Mixed 290 63% 289 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 17.5 76% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17.4 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 87.9 68% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 106%
PNY CS1311 120GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 73GB free Firmware: 1122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 387 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 17 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 105 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 48	44.3% Average	Read 257 Write 178 Mixed 185 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 8.96 61% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 93.2 DQ Mixed 32.2 50% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 8x8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	MC Read 44.2 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 36.2 112% 39.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback