PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
Graphics | 1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP Compaq dc7800p Small Form Factor (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AA8h |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20070718 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Aug 18 '17 at 00:36 |
Run Duration | 101 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$20
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 848E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.96
|
1.19%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
46.1%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
512, 512, 1024, 2048, 36864 MB
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $20Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 24x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 8x |
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $48 |