Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 12 '17 at 01:29
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 816
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 974
60% 974 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 156
Parallax 136
123% 148 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 146
Splatting 120
105% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 485
Mixed 410
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 34.7
156% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 141
141% 227 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 88
Write 104
Mixed 70.7
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.15
66% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
14GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 15.1
Mixed 20.6
26% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.12
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 1.12
133% 2.52 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.9% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $686
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback